Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Marketing Management

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Entrepreneurship
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Farquhar, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Founders versus Descendants

The Profitability, Growth and Efficiency Characteristics Comparison in the UK Small and Medium Sized Family Businesses

Yong Wang

Yong Wang is Senior Lecturer in Entrepreneurship and Information Management.

Pervaiz Ahmed

Pervaiz Ahmed is Chair Professor in Management and Head, the Centre for Enterprise Excellence.

Stuart Farquhar

Stuart Farquhar is Senior Lecturer in Finance at Wolverhampton Business School, University of Wolverhampton, UK.

Family businesses and business families existed long before the genesis of historians and economists. In most economies, family business is estimated to represent over two–thirds of all enterprises and accounts for about half of the economic activity and private employment contributing to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Over the last two decades, family business studies have gathered momentum, which is reflected not only in terms of the number of published papers and publication outlets, but also in research support provided by agents and foundations. This article proffers researchers and practitioners empirical evidence of variations in financial performance of family businesses mastered by different generations. The article commences with a literature review of theories associated with business performance and family business governance, for example, agency theory, altruism and business lifecycle. This is followed by a description of the research methods adopted in this study. Statistical analyses are then conducted in two phases. Phase A employs univariate analyses to depict business demographic features. Phase B further investigates the differences of financial performance between family businesses marshalled by owner–managers in different generations. In summary, the article concludes with a set of tentative recommendations. It is anticipated that this study will bring to the surface the debate on issues surrounding the practice of family business management and widen awareness of the critical factors shaping business performance.

References

  • Alchian, A.A. & Woodward, S. (1988). The firm is sead: Long live the firm—a review of Oliver E. Williamson's The Economic Institutions of Capitalism . Journal of Economic Literature, 26: 65–79 .
  • Anderson, R. & Reeb, D. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 . Journal of Finance, 58: 1301–328 .[CrossRef]
  • Ang, J.S., Cole, R.A. & Lin, J.W. (2000). Agency cost and ownership structure . Journal of Finance, 55: 81–106 .[CrossRef]
  • Astrachan, J.H. & Shanker, M.C. (2003). Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy: A closer look . Family Business Review, 16: 211–19 .
  • Baldridge, D. & Schulze, W.S. (1999). Fairness in family firms. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academic of Management. New Jersey: Rowan University .
  • Barney, J.B. & Hesterly, W. (1999). Organisational economics: Understanding the relationship between organisations and economic analysis. In S.R. Clegg and C. Hardy (eds), Studying Organisation: Theory and Method. London: Sage .
  • Barth, H. (2003). Fit among competitive strategy, administrative mechanisms, and performance: A comparative study of small firms in mature and new industries . Journal of Small Business Management, 41: 133–47 .[CrossRef]
  • Becker, G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
  • Berger, A.N. & Udell, G.F. (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle . Journal of Banking and Finance, 22: 613–73 .[CrossRef]
  • Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A. & Platts, K. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems . International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20: 754–71 .[CrossRef]
  • Buchanan, J.M. (1975). The Samaritan's dilemma. In E.S. Phelps (ed.) Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation .
  • Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H. & Litz, R.A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non–family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28: 335–54 .[CrossRef]
  • Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J. & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behaviour . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23: 19–39 .
  • Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J. and Sharma, P. (2003). Succession and non–succession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with non–family managers . Family Business Review, 16: 89–107 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J. and Steier, L.P. (2003). Extending the theoretical horizons of family business research . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Summer: 331–38 .
  • Churchill, N. & Lewis, V. (1983). The five stages of small business growth . Harvard Business Review, 61: 30–50 .
  • Coleman, S. & Carsky, M. (1999). Sources of capital for small family owned businesses: Evidence from the national survey of small business finances . Family Business Review, 12: 73–85 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Combs, J.G. & Ketchen, D.J. (1999). Explaining inter–firm cooperation and performance . Strategic Management Journal, 20: 867–88 .[CrossRef]
  • Covin, J.G. and Slevin, D.P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behaviour . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall, 16: 7–25 .
  • Cox, D. (1987). Motives for private income transfers . Journal of Political Economy, 95: 508–45 . [CrossRef]
  • Daily, C.M. & Dollinger, M.J. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms . Family Business Review, 5: 117–36 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Deakins, D. & Freel, M. (2003). Entrepreneurship and Small Firms. London: McGraw Hill .
  • Department of Trade and Industry (2006). DTI News Release.
  • Dodge, R. & Robbins, J. (1992). An empirical investigation of the organisational life cycle model for small business development and survival . Journal of Small Business Management, 30: 27–37 .
  • Donkels, R. & Fröhlich, E. (1991). Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS . Family Business Review, 4: 149–60 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review . Academy of Management Review, 14: 57–74 .[CrossRef]
  • Eshel, I., Samuelson, L. & Shaked, A. (1998). Altruists, egoists, and holligans in a local interaction model . American Economic Review, 88: 157–79 .
  • Fama, E. & Jensen, M.C. (1983a). Separation of ownership and control . Journal of Law and Economy, 26: 301–25 .[CrossRef]
  • Fama, E. & Jensen, M.C. (1983b). Agency problem and residual claims . Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 325–44 .
  • Gomez–Mejia, L.R., Nunez–Nickel, M. & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts . Academy of Management Journal, 44: 81–95 .[CrossRef]
  • Gudmundson, D., Hartman, E.A. & Tower, C.B. (1999). Strategic orientation: Differences between family and non–family firms . Family Business Review, 12: 27–39 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hill, C.W. & Snell, S.A. (1989). Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity . Academy of Management Journal, 32: 25–46 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hite, J.M. & Hesterly, W.S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm . Strategic Management Journal, 22: 275–86 .[CrossRef]
  • Holmstrom, B. (1982). Moral hazard in teams . The Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 324–40 .[CrossRef]
  • Ibrahim, A.B., Dumas, C. & McGuire, J. (2001). Strategic decision making in small family firms: An empirical investigation . Journal of Small Business Strategy, 12: 1–11 .
  • Jennings, P. & Beaver, G. (1997). The performance and competitive advantage of small firms: A management perspective . International Small Business Journal, 15: 63–75 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Jensen, M.C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems . Journal of Finance, 48: 831–80 .[CrossRef]
  • Jensen, M.C. (1994). Self–interest, altruism, incentives, and agency . Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7: 40–45 .[CrossRef]
  • Jensen, M.C. (1998). Self–interest, Altruism, Incentives, and Agency—Foundations of Organisational Strategy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
  • Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure . Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–60 .[CrossRef]
  • Kang, D.L. (2000). The impact of family ownership on performance in public organisations: A study of the US fortune 500, 1982–1994 . Paper presented at academic of management meetings, Toronto, Canada.
  • Le Breton–Miller, I., Miller, D. & Steier, L.P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24: 305–28 .
  • Leach, P., Smith, W.K., Hart, A., Morris, T., Ainsworth, J., Beterlsen, E., Iraqi, S. & Pasari, V. (1990). Managing the Family Business in the UK: Stoy Hayward Survey in conjunction with the London Business School. London: Stoy Hayward .
  • Levin, A.Y. & Minton, J.W. (1986). Determining organisational effectiveness: Another look and an agenda for research . Management Science, 32: 514–53 .[CrossRef]
  • Lindbeck, A. & Weibull, J.W. (1988). Altruism and time consistency: The economics of a fait accompli . Journal of Political Economy, 96: 1165–182 .[CrossRef]
  • Littunen, H. (2003). Management capabilities and environmental characteristics in the critical operational phase of entrepreneurship: A comparison of finnish family and non–family firms . Family Business Review, 16: 183–97 .
  • Lubatkin, M.H., Ling, Y. & Schulze, W.S. (2003). Explaining agency problems in family firms using behavioural economics and justice theories . Paper presented at the academy of management meetings, Seattle, USA.
  • Marris, R. (1963). A model of managerial enterprise . Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77: 185–209 .[CrossRef]
  • McConaughy, D.L. & Phillips, G.M. (1999). Founders versus descendants: The profitability, efficiency, growth characteristics and financing in large, public, founding–family–controlled firms . Family Business Review, 12: 123–31 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • McKiernan, P. & Morris, C. (1994). Strategic planning and financial performance in UK SMEs: Does formality matter? British Journal of Management, 5: S31–S41 .[CrossRef]
  • Mohlo, I. (1997). The Economics of Information: Lying and Cheating in Markets and Organisations. Oxford: Blackwell .
  • Morris, M.H., Williams, R.O., Allen, J.A. & Avila, R.A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions . Journal of Business Venturing, 12: 385–401 .[CrossRef]
  • Murphy, G.B., Trailer, J.W. & Hill, R.C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research . Journal of Business Research, 36: 15–23 .[CrossRef]
  • Payne, P.L. (1984). Family business in Britain: A historical and analytical survey. In Akio Okochi and Shigeaki Yasuoka (eds) Family Business in the Era of Industrial Growth: its Ownership and Management. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press .
  • Peterson, R. & Schulman, J. (1987). Capital structure of growing small firms: A 12–country study on Becoming Bankable . International Small Business Journal, 5: 10–22 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Poutziouris, P. (2001). The (Re)–emergence of growth vis–É–vis control dilemma in a family business growth star: The case of the UK Taramosalada Kings. In P. Poutziouris and D. Pistrui (eds) Family Business Research in the Third Millennium—Building Bridges between Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: The Family Firm Institute Publication .
  • Poutziouris, P., Binks, M. & Bruce, A. (1999). A problem–based phenomenological growth model for small manufacturing firms . Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 6: 139–52 .[CrossRef]
  • Poutziouris, P. & Wang, Y. (2003). The Strategic orientation of family business owner–managers: Evidence from the UK SME economy . Paper presented at the 48th world conference international council for small business—advancing entrepreneurship and small business, Belfast, June.
  • Poutziouris, P. & Wang, Y. (2004). The views of UK family business owners on flotation . International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 10: 106–26 .[CrossRef]
  • Poza, E.F., Alfred, T. & Maheshawi, A. (1997). Stakeholder perceptions of culture and management practices in family and family firms—A preliminary report . Family Business Review, 10: 135–55 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Reid, R., Dunn, B., Cromie, S. & Adams, J. (1999). Family orientation in family firms: A model and some empirical evidence . Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 6: 55–67 .[CrossRef]
  • Romano, C.A., Tanewski, G.A. & Smyrnios, K.X. (2000). Capital structure decision making: A model for family business . Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 285–310 .[CrossRef]
  • Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H. & Dino, R.N. (2002). Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms . Managerial and Decision Economics, 23: 247–59 .[CrossRef]
  • Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N. & Buchholtz, A.K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence . Organisational Science, 12: 99–116 .[CrossRef]
  • Scott, M. & Bruce, R. (1987). 5 stages of growth in small business . Long Range Planning, 20: 45–52 .
  • Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future . Family Business Review, 17: 1–36 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Smallbone, D. & Wyer, P. (2000). Growth and development in the small firm. In S. Carter and D. Jones–Evans (eds) Enterprise and small business: Principles, practice and policy. Harlow, Essex: FT–Prentice Hall .
  • Smallbone, D., Leigh, R. & North, D. (1995). The Characteristics and strategies of high growth firms . International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 1: 44–62 .[CrossRef]
  • Storey, D.J. (1994). Understanding the Small Business Sector. London: International Thomson Business Press .
  • Stulz, R.M. (1988). On takeover resistance, managerial discretion, and shareholder wealth . Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 25–54 .[CrossRef]
  • Thaler, R.H. & Shefrin, H.M. (1981). An economic theory of self–control . Journal of Political Economy, 89: 392–406 .[CrossRef]
  • Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organisations: The network effect . American Sociological Review, 61: 674–98 .[CrossRef]
  • Venkatraman, N. & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches . Academy of Management Review, 1: 801–14 .
  • Vilaseca, A. (2002). The shareholder role in the family business: Conflict of interests and objectives between non–employed shareholders and top management team . Family Business Review, 15: 299–320 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Westhead, P. & Cowling, M. (1995). Employment change in independent owner–managed high–technology firms in great Britain . Small Business Economics, 7: 111–40 .[CrossRef]
  • Westhead, P. & Cowling, M. (1997). Performance contrasts between family and non–family unquoted companies in the UK . International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 3: 30–52 .[CrossRef]
  • Westhead, P., Cowling, M. & Howorth, C. (2001). The development of family companies: Management and ownership imperatives . Family Business Review, 14: 369–85 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Williamson, O. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Boston, MA: The Free Press .
  • Wortman, M.S. Jr (1994). Theoretical foundations for family–owned business: A conceptual and research–based paradigm . Family Business Review, 7: 3–27 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol. 16, No. 2, 173-195 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/097135570701600203
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Farquhar, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?